معنا، اصول و روش تعامل، از منظر مدرسین تربیت بدنی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی آذربایجان شرقی رویکرد مفهوم‌سازی بنیادی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی / Released under (CC BY-NC 4.0) license/ Open Access

نویسندگان

1 علوم تربیتی. دانشگاه سیستان و بلوچستان. زاهدان.ایران(مامور در دانشگاه زنجان)

2 تربیت بدنی. دانشگاه فرهنگیان تبریز. تبریز. ایران

3 علوم تربیتی. دانشگاه فرهنگیان تبریز. تبریز. ایران

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش استخراج معنای تعامل در جو آموزش عالی با استناد به دیدگاه اساتید تربیت بدنی است. روش پژوهش، نظریه بنیادی مبتنی بر رویکرد استقرایی است. منبع جمع‌آوری داده‌ها، مصاحبه با اساتید تربیت بدنی دانشگاههای آزاد اسلامی استان آذربایجان شرقی می‌باشد. ازآنجایی‌که روش پژوهش بنیادی است، تعداد نمونه، منوط به اشباع نظری می باشد؛ پژوهش بعد از کدگذاری و تعیین درون‌مایه‌ها، در مصاحبه بیست و هشتم به اشباع نظری رسید. بعد از مبانی نظری و در فرایند تحلیل داده‌ها، ابتدا کدگذاری، بعد یافتن وجوه مشترک ایده‌ها و سرانجام استنتاج درون‌مایه‌های اصلی و فرعی و در نهایت جمع‌بندی صورت گرفت. 1) برای معنای تعامل درون مایه (تم) اصلی عاملیت استنتاج شد2 ) برای وجه ممتاز و ویژگی مهم تعامل، فهم متقابل و پذیرش غیر انتخاب شد 3 ) برای کنش های مربی متربی" ارتباط افقی" و در نهایت، تجربه زیسته حرفه ای" بعنوان تم اصلی، در مقبولیت مبانی فکری اساتید در باب تعامل، استنتاج شد.
کلمات کلیدی: تعامل، آموزش عالی، مفهوم سازی بنیادی، اساتید

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The meaning, principles and method of interaction in Higher Education from the perspective of Physical education professors of Islamic Azad University of East Azarbaijan province

نویسندگان [English]

  • masoud khanjarkhani 1
  • sohrab yazdani 2
  • rasul rezaei 3
1 Educational Science. University of Sistan and Baluchestan. Zahedan, Iran
2 Physical Education. Farhangian University of Tabriz. Tabriz. Iran
3 Educational Science. Farhangian University of Tabriz. Tabriz. Iran
چکیده [English]

IntroductionThe concept of interaction in higher education was extracted based on the perspective of physical education professors at the Islamic Azad University of East Azerbaijan Province.
MethodsThe study was carried out through a grounded theory method based on an inductive approach. The data collection source involved interviews with physical education professors at the Islamic Azad University of East Azerbaijan province. The study was carried out through a grounded theory methodology. The population under study comprised all physical education professors at the Islamic Azad University of East Azerbaijan in the year 2022 (n=87). Given that sample size in grounded theory research is contingent upon theoretical saturation, after coding and identifying core themes, saturation was achieved in the 28th interview.
Results: Following theoretical foundations and data analysis, the process involved coding, identifying commonalities in ideas, and ultimately inferencing main and subsidiary themes and summarizing. The key findings are as follows: 1) The core theme for the concept of interaction was "agency". 2) The distinctive and important aspect of interaction was "mutual understanding and accepting others." 3) For instructor-learner actions, the horizontal relationship and, ultimately, the professional life experience served as the central theme, reflecting the cognitive foundations of professors' perspectives on interaction.
Conclusion: In the interaction between professor and student, they collaborate together. And after "self-understanding" occurs, "other understanding" begins, which also leads to "mutual understanding".

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: interaction
  • higher education
  • fundamental conceptualization
  • professors

Ahmadi H. The conformity barriers of virtual technologies in higher education according to the
masters' personal epistemology: a case study. Journal title 2016; 2 (31):16-31
Bahador H., Faraji Armaki A., Ghorbani R., Dehghani E.. Effective Factors on Communication
between Teacher and Student Medical Students of Basic Sciences Level View. Educ
Strategy Med Sci 2014; 6 (4):195-200.
Strauss, Anselm L.(2006). Basics of qualitative research. Translate by Mohammadi.B. Tehran:
Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies.
Akbari, J. (2011). Habermas's Methodological and Philosophical Ideas. Philosophy of Science,
1(1), 1-35.
Bagheri, K. (2014). Teaching ‘to’ and Learning ‘from’. Foundations of Education, 3(2), 5-24.
Doi: 10.22067/fe.v3i2.24768.
Beheshti.S. (2009). Reflections on the philosophy of education. Tehran: International Publishing.
Poua, A., Tabatabai, H. (2010). Qualitative Research Strategy of Basic Conceptualization
Theory: Concept, Paradigm, Features and Additional Issues. Bimonthly Journal of
Police Human Development, Year 8, Number 37, pp. 13-38.
Tavassoli, T. (2013). Continental Philosophy and its Influence on the Philosophy of Education.
Journal of Religious Thought: A Quarterly Journal of Shiraz University, 12(44), 55-78.
doi: 10.22099/jrt.2013.1153
Khanjarkhany, Z., Safaei Moghaddam, M., Pakseresht, M., Maradhi, S., & Boostani, A. (2015).
Philosophical Hermeneutics and a New Account of "Attendance and Absence" in the
Field of Education Abstract. Journal of Educational Scinces, 22(1), 5-22. doi:
10.22055/edu.2015.13833
Khanjarkhani, M., Safaei Moghadam, M., & Pakseresht, M. J. (2017). Philosophical
Hermeneutics and its Implications for Self-Understanding, Otherness- Understanding
and Together – Understanding, in Education. Foundations of Education, 6(2), 5-20. doi:
10.22067/fedu.v6i2.47635.
Delaware, A (1389). Qualitative methodology. Strategy Quarterly, 19(54).329-307.
Sobhaninejad, M., Abdul Hiyar, A., Ahmadabadi Arani, N. (2014). Review and criticism of
Sartre's educational system with an emphasis on Shahid Motahari's educational
opinions, research in Islamic education and training issues, (23) 29, 106-83.
Sajjadi, S., Imanzadeh, A. (2011). Explanation and analysis of educational implications of
Gilles Deleuze's epistemological perspective and criticism of its implications for
education. New Educational Thoughts, 8(4), 53-85.
Sajjadi, S., Rezanejad Joulii, N. (2007). Heidegger's hermeneutic perspective and education.
Psychology and Educational Sciences (Tehran University) 87, 45-66.
Shahidi, F., Zarif Sanyaei, N. (2012). Interaction in e-learning. Electronic Learning Academic
Quarterly, 4, (3). 48-55.
Talebzadeh nobarian, M., Mirloo, M. M., & mousavi, H. (2012). Reflecting on Bertrand Russell’s
Educational Reflections. Foundations of Education, 1(2), -. doi: 10.22067/fe.v1i2.9521
Kamal Kharrazi, A. N., Bazargan, A., Narenji Sani, F., & Mostafavi, Z. S. (2016). The relationship
between interaction of engineering and technical students' in e-learning environments higher education institute of Mehr Alborz and their academic performance. Iranian Journal
of Engineering Education, 17(68), 89-111. doi: 10.22047/ijee.2016.12052
Gholami K, asady M. (2014). The Professors’s professional experience in relation to effective
teaching phenomen in higher education. Journal of theory and practice .1(2,)26-5.
Ghafari, A. (2016). Investigation and analysis of the moral results of the allegory of the cave in
Plato's thought. Religious Anthropology, 14(38), 127-142.
Ghanei Rad, M. A., Maleki, A., & Mohammadi, Z. (2013). The Study of Cultural Change in
Three Generations of aAcademicians (Case Study: Professors of Social Sciences at
Tehran Universities). Iranian Journal of Sociology, 15(1), 30-64.
Ghaempour, M. A. (2023). Social and scientific communications in Sharif University: students' points of
view. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 20(4), 95-121.
Mohammadpour, A .(2010).)Qualitative research method against method (two volumes).
Tehran: Sociologists.
Merghati khoii E A, RImaz S, Zarei F, dastoorpour M. Exploring The Teaching and Learning
Approaches from the viewpoint of Postgraduate Students and their Lecturers. Iran J
Health Educ Health Promot 2013; 1 (3) :67-82
Hashemi Ardakani, S. H., Noroozi, R. A., & Bakhtiar Nasrabadi, H. A. (2008). A Review of
Sohrevardi’s Epistemology and its Educational Implications. Journal of Islamic
Education, 3(6), 161-180
Gutek, J.L. (2001). Philosophical and ideological perspectives on education, (M.J. Pakseresht,
Trans.). Tehran: Samt publication (In Persian)
Corbin, Juliet & Anselm Staruss (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research. London: Sage
Publications, 3ed.
Creswell, W. John (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Reaserch Design. California, Sage Pubicationcs, Inc.
Goulding, Christina (1999). Grounded Theory: Some Reflections on Paradigm, Procedures and
Misconceptions. University of Wolverhampton, UK.
Maxwell, J (2014). Qulitative Research Desin: An interactive approaches, London: Sage Publications.
Polit DF, Beck CT (2013). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing
practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 8th ed.
Polit DF, Beck CT (2006). Essentials of Nursing Research. Philadelphia: lippincott Co, 6th Ed.
Ritchie, J & Lewis, J (2005). Qualitative Research Practice: A guide for social science students
and researchers. Londen: Sage Publications.
Watkins, D (1992) .FACULTY and student interaction.GLARK, B.R.andneave, G.R (edits).
Encyclopedia of higher education.3: 1614-1605.
Zhao, C.M.; C.M. Golde & A.C. McCormick (2007). More than a Signature: How Advisor
Choice and Advisor Behavior Affect Doctoral Student Satisfaction. Journal of Further
and Higher Education, 31(3): 263-281.
Deleuze, G., and Guitar, F. (1987). A Thousand plateaus: capitalism and Schizophrenia,
Minneapolis: university of Minnesota press.