آموزش تربیت‌بدنی در مدارس از دید کودکان، معلمان و استادان علوم ورزشی: کشف عوامل مرتبط با روش‌های خطی/ غیرخطی/ آموزش بازی برای درک

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی / Released under (CC BY-NC 4.0) license/ Open Access

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه الزهرا

2 Damghan University

چکیده

یافتن بهترین شیوه آموزش برای کمک به رشد و پیشرفت کودکان ضروری است. لذا هدف این مطالعه کیفی کشف عوامل مرتبط با آموزش از دید کودکان، معلمان و استادان علوم ورزشی بود. جامعه آماری این مطالعه کلیه کودکان سنین ابتدایی شهر اسدآباد همدان، معلمان تربیت‌بدنی با حداقل 20 سال تجربه و استادان تربیت‌بدنی با حداقل درجه دانشیاری کل ایران بود. برای انجام این مطالعه بر مبنای اشباع نظری و به روش هدفمند با 10 کودک، 10 معلم و 8 استاد مصاحبه شد. در این راستا نتایج مصاحبه غیرحضوری نیمه‌ساختاریافته این مطالعه نشان داد کودکان آموزش مناسب را در بازی، عدم‌مداخله معلم، عدم‌توضیح کلامی و داوری صحیح می‌دانند. از نظر معلمان در آموزش صحیح باید از بازی، استفاده از تجهیزات و بازخورد استفاده شود و استادان نیز بازی، دستکاری محیط و توضیح کلامی را برای آموزش مناسب مؤثر می‌دانستند. به‌عنوان یک نتیجه‌گیری کلی نتایج این مطالعه بر دستکاری قیود و بازی که مرتبط با اصول روش‌های پویایی بوم‌شناختی است تأکید دارد. بااین‌حال نتیجه مهم این مطالعه شکاف بین نظر کودکان و معلمان/ استادان در مورد آموزش است؛ چراکه معلمان/ استادان هنوز به بازخورد و توضیح کلامی تأکیددارند؛ اما کودکان به‌هیچ‌عنوان این موارد را در آموزش مناسب نمی‌دانند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Teaching physical education in schools from the viewpoint of children, teachers and sport sciences professors: detection of factors related to linear, non-linear, and Teaching Games For Understanding methods

نویسندگان [English]

  • leyla rostami 1
  • Masoumeh Shojaei 1
  • Afkham Daneshfar 1
  • Behzad MOHAMMADI ORANGI 2
1 alzahra university
2 Damghan Uviversity
چکیده [English]

Finding the best teaching methods to help children development and improvement is essential. Therefore, the purpose of this qualitative study was to discover the factors related to education from the perspective of children, teachers and sport sciences professors. The statistical population of this study was all elementary school children in Asadabad, Hamadan, physical education teachers with at least 20 years of experience, and physical education professors with at least a university degree in Iran. To conduct this study, based on theoretical saturation and a purposeful method, 10 children, 10 teachers, and 8 professors were interviewed. In this regard, the results of the offline semi-structured interview of this study showed that children consider appropriate education in the game, lack of teacher intervention, lack of verbal explanation, and correct judgment. According to teachers, games, use of equipment and feedback should be used in proper education, and professors also considered games, environment manipulation and verbal explanation to be effective for proper education. As a general conclusion, the results of this study emphasize the manipulation of constraints and games that are related to the principles of ecological dynamics methods. However, the important result of this study is the gap between the opinion of children and teachers/professors about education; Because teachers/professors still emphasize verbal feedback and explanation; But children do not consider these things appropriate in education.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • semi-structured interview
  • elementary school
  • motor learning
  • sports
  • teaching method
s
Artha, A. A., & Priambodo, A. (2020). The Application of Teams Games Tournament (TGT)
and Teaching Game for Understanding (TGfU) Learning Models on Learning Motivation
and Volley Ball Passing Skills. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics
and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(1), 46–53.
Benjaminse, A., & Otten, E. (2011). ACL injury prevention, more effective with a different way
of motor learning?. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 19(4), 622–627.
Chang, M. Y. L., Chow, J. Y., Button, C., & Tan, C. W. K. (2017). Nonlinear pedagogy and its
role in encouraging 21st century competencies through physical education: A Singapore
experience.
Chen, A. (2001). ATheoretical Conceptualisation for Motivation Research in Physical
Education: An Integrated Perspective. Quest, 53, 35–58.
Chow, J.-Y., K. Davids, C., Button, R., Shuttleworth, I., Renshaw, and D., & Araujo. (2007). The
Role of Nonlinear Pedagogy in Physical Education. Review of Educational Research, 77(3).
Côté, J., Salmela, J. H., & Russell, S. J. (1995). The knowledge of high-performance gymnastics
coaches: Methodological framework. The Sport Psychologist, 9, 65–75.
Davoodi, M., Yaali, R., Ghadiri, F., & Bahram, A. (2021). The effect of TGFU, SE, combination
(TGFU+ SE) and linear training on children’s creativity in futsal. Journal of Motor Learning
and Movement, 13(3), 293–311.
Dehghani, M. (1400). How to train in sports clubs in Tehran: nonlinear versus linear method.
Research in Sport Management and Motor Behavior, under press.
Gil-Arias, A., Harvey, S., Cárceles, A., Práxedes, A., & Del Villar, F. (2017a). Impact of a
hybrid TGfU-Sport Education unit on student motivation in physical education. PloS One,
12(6), e0179876.
Greenwood, D., Davids, K., & Renshaw, I. (2012). How elite coaches’ experiential knowledge
might enhance empirical research on sport performance. International Journal of Sports
Science & Coaching, 7(2), 411–422.
Greenwood, D., Davids, K., & Renshaw, I. (2014). Experiential knowledge of expert coaches can help
identify informational constraints on performance of dynamic interceptive actions. Journal of
Sports Sciences, 32(4), 328–335.
Lee, M. C. Y., Chow, J. Y., Komar, J., & Button, C. (2014). Nonlinear pedagogy: an effective
approach to cater for individual differences in learning a sports skill . PloS One, 9(8), e104744.
Aghdasi, M. A, Orangi, B. M., & Yaali, R. (2019). Self-esteem changes and motor proficiency
influenced by manipulating the environment of an extracurricular physical education class:
Testing the new inclusive learning method in a boy with developmental coordination
disorder: A mix method study. Motor Behavior in Kharazmi University, Under press.
Mohammadi, M., Balavi, O. S., Jahani, J., Sarvestan, M. S., & Daryanoosh, F. (2019). The Impact
of the “TGFU” Approach on Students’ Sport Skills in Secondary First Course. Studies in
Learning & Instruction, 11(1163–182).
Mohammadi Orangi, B., Yaali, R., Ackah-Jnr, F. R., Bahram, A., & Ghadiri, F. (2021). The effect
of nonlinear and linear methods and inclusive education on self-esteem and motor proficiency
of ordinary and overactive children. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences & Research, 8(2).
Moy, B., Renshaw, I., & Davids, K. (2016). The impact of nonlinear pedagogy on physical
education teacher education students’ intrinsic motivation. Physical Education and Sport
Pedagogy, 21(5), 517–538.
Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A Self-Determination Approach to the Understanding of Motivation in
Physical Education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 225–242.
Ntoumanis, N., Pensgaard, A., Martin, C., & Pipe, K. (2004). An Idiographic Analysis of
Amotivation in Compulsory School Physical Education. Journal of Sport and Exercise
Psychology, 26, 197–214.
Orangi, B. M., Yaali, R., Bahram, A., Aghdasi, M. T., van der Kamp, J., Vanrenterghem, J., & Jones,
P. A. (2021). Motor learning methods that induce high practice variability reduce kinematic and
kinetic risk factors of non-contact ACL injury. Human Movement Science, 78, 102805.
Raiola, G. (2017). Motor learning and teaching method. Journal of Physical Education and
Sport, 17, 2239–2243.
Renshaw, I., Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., & Button, C. (2015). Nonlinear pedagogy in skill
acquisition: An introduction. Routledge.
Renshaw, I., Davids, K., & Savelsbergh, G. (2010). Motor Learning in Practice: A Constraints-
led Approach. London: Routledge.
Richard, V., Lebeau, J. C., Becker, F., Boiangin, N., & Tenenbaum, G. (2018). Developing
Cognitive and Motor Creativity in Children Through an Exercise Program Using Nonlinear
Pedagogy Principles. Creativity Research Journal, 30(44), 391–401.
Rogers, S. (2024). Motor Control and Motor Learning. In
Kinesiology for Occupational Therapy (pp. 451-463).
Routledge.
Santos, S., Coutinho, D., Gonçalves, B., Schöllhorn, W., Sampaio, J., & Leite, N. (2018).
Differential learning as a key training approach to improve creative and tactical behavior
in soccer. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 89(1), 11–24.
Santos, S., Jiménez, S., Sampaio, J., & Leite, N. (2017). Effects of the Skills4Genius sports-
based training program in creative behavior. PLoS One, 12, e0172520.
Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., Winstein, C., Wulf, G., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2018a). Motor control
and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Human kinetics
seed hossieni. E, N., & seyed hossieni. R, N. i. (2017). Effects of TGFU Teaching Method on
Self-Determine Motivation and Learning of Volleyball Serve in Adolescent Students.
Motor Behavior, 9(29), 17–34.
Smith, A., & Parr, M. (2007). Young People’s Views on the Nature and Purposes of Physical
Education: A Sociological Analysis. Sport, Education and Society, 12(1), 37–58.
Standage, M., J. L. Duda, and N. N. (2003). A Model of Contextual Motivation in Physical
Education: Using Constructs and Tenets From Self-Determination and Goal Perspective
Theories to Predict Leisure-Time Exercise Intentions J. Ournal of Educational
Psychology, 95, 97–110.
Stodden, D. F., Goodway, J. D., Langendorfer, S. J., Roberton, M. A., Rudisill, M. E., Garcia,
C., & Garcia, L. E. (2008). A developmental perspective on the role of motor skill
competence in physical activity: An emergent relationship. Quest, 60(2), 290–306.
SueSee, B., & Edwards, K. (2011). Self-identified and Observed Teaching Styles of Senior
Physical Education Teachers in Queensland Schools. Proceedings of the 27th ACHPER
Inter-National Conference: Moving, Learning and Achieving, Prince Alfred College,
Adelaide, South Australia, 18–20.
Supriadi, D. (2019). Implementasi Model Teaching Game for Understanding terhadap
Keterampilan Bermain dalam Strike and Fielding Games. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan,
18(3), 270–275.
Vallerand, R. J. (2001). A hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Sport and
Exercise,. Champaign, Ilinois: Human Kinetics. In Advances in Motivation in Sport and
Exercise, Edited by G. C. Roberts, 263–320.
Williams, A. M., & Hodges, N. J. (2005). Practice, Instruction and Skill Acquisition:
Challenging Tradition. Journal of Sports Sciences, 23(6), 637–650.
Yaali, R., Ymoori, N., & Bagheri, S. (2020). The Effect of Training Method (Linear and
Nonlinear) on Student Participation Motivation in Physical Education Class. Sport
Psychology Studies, 8(30), 205–220.